Crusoe Cloud vs Latitude.sh: GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for Crusoe Cloud and Latitude.sh. Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
Crusoe Cloud powers H100 SXM5 and B200 GPU instances using stranded and renewable energy sources, making it one of the few carbon-negative on-demand GPU cloud providers in the US. Competitive pricing on H100 clusters for AI training and LLM fine-tuning, with a mission to reduce the carbon footprint of large-scale compute. An ideal choice for ESG-conscious enterprises and AI labs that want high-performance hardware without the environmental cost.
- Clean energy compute
- Competitive H100 pricing
- B200 availability
- Carbon-negative mission
Latitude.sh provides bare-metal H100, A100, and RTX 4090 servers with no virtualization overhead across US, EU, and Brazil data centers, delivering dedicated hardware performance for latency-sensitive AI inference and distributed training. On-demand and reserved billing options are available with predictable pricing and no noisy-neighbor effects. A top choice for teams that need bare-metal GPU performance with global reach including LATAM coverage.
- Bare-metal performance
- No virtualization overhead
- Brazil region
- Predictable pricing
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
Crusoe Cloud — specialist provider
Crusoe Cloud powers H100 SXM5 and B200 GPU instances using stranded and renewable energy sources, making it one of the few carbon-negative on-demand GPU cloud providers in the US. Competitive pricing on H100 clusters for AI training and LLM fine-tuning, with a mission to reduce the carbon footprint of large-scale compute. An ideal choice for ESG-conscious enterprises and AI labs that want high-performance hardware without the environmental cost.
Latitude.sh — bare-metal provider
Latitude.sh provides bare-metal H100, A100, and RTX 4090 servers with no virtualization overhead across US, EU, and Brazil data centers, delivering dedicated hardware performance for latency-sensitive AI inference and distributed training. On-demand and reserved billing options are available with predictable pricing and no noisy-neighbor effects. A top choice for teams that need bare-metal GPU performance with global reach including LATAM coverage.
Billing model comparison
Crusoe Cloud uses a On-demand, Reserved billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Latitude.sh uses On-demand, Reserved billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
Crusoe Cloud is best suited for: Sustainability-focused teams, Large-scale AI training, ESG-conscious enterprises. Its key strengths are clean energy compute, competitive h100 pricing, b200 availability. Latitude.sh is best suited for: Performance-critical workloads, Latency-sensitive inference, LATAM teams. Its key strengths are bare-metal performance, no virtualization overhead, brazil region. Both providers target similar workload profiles — the live pricing table above is the most reliable way to determine which offers better value for your specific GPU model and region requirements.
Support tiers and region coverage
Crusoe Cloud offers Standard → Enterprise support across 2 regions (US-West, US-Central). Latitude.sh offers Standard → Enterprise support across 3 regions (US-East, EU-West, BR-South). Latitude.sh's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: Crusoe Cloud vs Latitude.sh
Crusoe Cloud was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA. Latitude.sh was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil. Crusoe Cloud has 2 years more operational history than Latitude.sh, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.