Runcrate vs Atlas Cloud: GPU Compute Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of GPU compute pricing, regions, billing models, and strengths for Runcrate and Atlas Cloud. Updated July 2026.
Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
Runcrate is a Berlin-based GPU cloud marketplace aggregating bare-metal and VM instances across 21 GPU types and 11 global regions, with some of the lowest starting prices for on-demand GPU rental available anywhere. The marketplace model gives teams access to H100, A100, and a wide range of other GPU SKUs through a single platform, with flexible spot and on-demand billing. A cost-effective option for EU-based teams needing broad GPU variety and multi-region flexibility.
- 21 GPU types
- 11 global regions
- Very competitive pricing
- Bare metal + VM options
Atlas Cloud is an Iceland-based GPU cloud offering H100 and A100 instances powered by 100% renewable geothermal energy, combining high-performance AI compute with a genuinely carbon-neutral infrastructure footprint. Competitive on-demand pricing and low-latency connectivity to Europe make it an attractive sustainable GPU cloud for EU-based AI training and inference workloads. A top choice for sustainability-focused teams that want green GPU compute without sacrificing performance.
- 100% renewable energy
- Competitive H100 pricing
- Low latency to Europe
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
Runcrate — marketplace provider
Runcrate is a Berlin-based GPU cloud marketplace aggregating bare-metal and VM instances across 21 GPU types and 11 global regions, with some of the lowest starting prices for on-demand GPU rental available anywhere. The marketplace model gives teams access to H100, A100, and a wide range of other GPU SKUs through a single platform, with flexible spot and on-demand billing. A cost-effective option for EU-based teams needing broad GPU variety and multi-region flexibility.
Atlas Cloud — specialist provider
Atlas Cloud is an Iceland-based GPU cloud offering H100 and A100 instances powered by 100% renewable geothermal energy, combining high-performance AI compute with a genuinely carbon-neutral infrastructure footprint. Competitive on-demand pricing and low-latency connectivity to Europe make it an attractive sustainable GPU cloud for EU-based AI training and inference workloads. A top choice for sustainability-focused teams that want green GPU compute without sacrificing performance.
Billing model comparison
Runcrate uses a On-demand, Spot billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Atlas Cloud uses On-demand billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
Runcrate is best suited for: Cost-sensitive teams, Multi-region deployments, Wide GPU variety needs. Its key strengths are 21 gpu types, 11 global regions, very competitive pricing. Atlas Cloud is best suited for: Sustainability-focused teams, European AI workloads, Training runs. Its key strengths are 100% renewable energy, competitive h100 pricing, low latency to europe. Marketplace providers aggregate GPU supply from multiple sources, often offering the lowest spot rates but with more variable availability and less predictable performance compared to dedicated providers.
Support tiers and region coverage
Runcrate offers Community → Standard support across 4 regions (EU-Central, US, APAC and 1 more). Atlas Cloud offers Standard support across 1 region (IS). Runcrate's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: Runcrate vs Atlas Cloud
Runcrate was founded in 2024 and is headquartered in Berlin, Germany. Atlas Cloud was founded in 2022 and is headquartered in Reykjavik, Iceland. Atlas Cloud has 2 years more operational history than Runcrate, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.