Provider Overview
Strengths & Best For
Salad leverages a distributed network of consumer GPUs — including RTX 4090 and RTX 3090 — to deliver some of the lowest AI inference prices on the market, making it ideal for batch image generation, LLM inference, and cost-sensitive AI workloads. The marketplace model enables per-use billing with no minimum commitment, dramatically undercutting traditional on-demand GPU cloud pricing for fault-tolerant jobs. Best suited for workloads that can tolerate variable hardware rather than requiring guaranteed uptime.
- Extremely low prices
- Consumer GPU network
- Batch inference focus
- Pay-per-use
Corelink is a GPU cloud offering H100, H200, A100, and L40S instances with flexible billing, spot availability, and competitive on-demand pricing for AI training and inference workloads. The self-serve platform makes it easy to provision GPU capacity for LLM fine-tuning, distributed training, and model deployment without enterprise contracts. A straightforward on-demand GPU cloud for startups and research teams that need H100 access at competitive rates.
- Competitive H100 pricing
- Spot availability
- Flexible billing
- Wide GPU selection
Live GPU Pricing
Region Coverage
Popular Comparisons
Salad — marketplace provider
Salad leverages a distributed network of consumer GPUs — including RTX 4090 and RTX 3090 — to deliver some of the lowest AI inference prices on the market, making it ideal for batch image generation, LLM inference, and cost-sensitive AI workloads. The marketplace model enables per-use billing with no minimum commitment, dramatically undercutting traditional on-demand GPU cloud pricing for fault-tolerant jobs. Best suited for workloads that can tolerate variable hardware rather than requiring guaranteed uptime.
Corelink — specialist provider
Corelink is a GPU cloud offering H100, H200, A100, and L40S instances with flexible billing, spot availability, and competitive on-demand pricing for AI training and inference workloads. The self-serve platform makes it easy to provision GPU capacity for LLM fine-tuning, distributed training, and model deployment without enterprise contracts. A straightforward on-demand GPU cloud for startups and research teams that need H100 access at competitive rates.
Billing model comparison
Salad uses a Per-use (serverless) billing model with a minimum commitment of None. Corelink uses On-demand, Spot billing with a None minimum. Both providers offer flexible billing options — compare the live pricing table above to find the best rate for your specific GPU model and workload duration.
Which workloads each provider suits best
Salad is best suited for: Budget inference workloads, Image generation pipelines, Cost-sensitive batch jobs. Its key strengths are extremely low prices, consumer gpu network, batch inference focus. Corelink is best suited for: Cost-sensitive AI training, Spot-tolerant workloads, Startups needing H100 access. Its key strengths are competitive h100 pricing, spot availability, flexible billing. Marketplace providers aggregate GPU supply from multiple sources, often offering the lowest spot rates but with more variable availability and less predictable performance compared to dedicated providers.
Support tiers and region coverage
Salad offers Community → Pro support across 2 regions (US, EU). Corelink offers Community → Standard support across 1 region (US). Salad's broader region footprint gives it an advantage for latency-sensitive workloads or teams with data residency requirements in specific geographies.
Provider background: Salad vs Corelink
Salad was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in Boston, MA. Corelink was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in United States. Salad has 3 years more operational history than Corelink, which may matter for teams evaluating provider stability and long-term contract risk. Use the live pricing table above to compare current on-demand and spot rates for specific GPU models, and the region map to verify coverage in your target geography.