Anthropic vs Meta: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of Anthropic and Meta — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.
Anthropic
Claude — safety-focused frontier AI with exceptional coding ability
Anthropic builds the Claude model family, known for long context windows (up to 200K tokens), strong coding performance, and a safety-first design philosophy. Claude 4 Opus and Sonnet lead on many coding and reasoning benchmarks. Prompt caching is available at significant discounts.
Meta
Llama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models
Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.
Key metrics
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Live token pricing
Strengths & weaknesses
Anthropic
Meta
Key differentiators
Claude 4 Opus scores highest on coding benchmarks among all frontier models, with a 200K context window and aggressive prompt caching.
The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.
Frequently asked questions
Anthropic FAQs
How much does the Anthropic Claude API cost?
Claude 4 Opus costs $15/1M input and $75/1M output tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $3/$15 per 1M tokens. Claude Haiku 3.5 is the budget option at $0.80/$4.00. Prompt caching reduces input costs by up to 90%.
What is the context window for Claude models?
All Claude models support a 200,000-token context window, making them ideal for processing long documents, codebases, or multi-turn conversations without truncation.
How does Anthropic prompt caching work?
Anthropic's prompt caching lets you mark portions of your prompt (system prompts, documents, tool definitions) to be cached server-side. Cached tokens are billed at 10% of the standard input price after the first write, making repeated long-context calls dramatically cheaper.
Meta FAQs
What is the Llama 4 context window?
Llama 4 Scout and Maverick support 1,000,000-token (1M) context windows. Llama 4 Behemoth also targets 1M context. This makes Llama 4 competitive with Gemini 1.5 Pro for long-document and multi-document tasks.
How much does the Meta Llama API cost?
Llama 3.2 1B is $0.02/1M tokens in/out. Llama 3.2 3B is $0.03/$0.05. Llama 3.1 8B is $0.02/$0.05. Llama 3.2 90B Vision is $1.20/$1.20. Muse Spark 1.1 is $1.25/$4.25. Llama 4 Behemoth pricing is not yet publicly listed.
Can I self-host Llama models?
Yes — all Llama 3.x and Llama 4 Scout/Maverick weights are publicly available under the Llama Community License. You can run them on any GPU cloud provider. A single H100 at ~$2.50/hr can serve Llama 3.1 8B at very high throughput, making self-hosting cost-effective above ~10M tokens/day.
Provider resources
Anthropic — Claude — safety-focused frontier AI with exceptional coding ability
Anthropic builds the Claude model family, known for long context windows (up to 200K tokens), strong coding performance, and a safety-first design philosophy. Claude 4 Opus and Sonnet lead on many coding and reasoning benchmarks. Prompt caching is available at significant discounts.
Claude 4 Opus scores highest on coding benchmarks among all frontier models, with a 200K context window and aggressive prompt caching.
Meta — Llama 4 & Muse Spark — the world's most widely deployed open-weight models
Meta AI is the creator of the Llama model family, the most widely used open-weight LLMs in the world. Llama models are available via Meta's own API and through dozens of third-party inference providers. The Llama 4 series includes Behemoth (2T params), Scout, and Maverick, with 1M-token context windows. Meta also offers Muse Spark, a proprietary multimodal model. Because Llama weights are open, teams can self-host on GPU cloud for dramatically lower per-token costs at scale.
The only frontier-class model family available as open weights — enabling self-hosted inference on GPU cloud at a fraction of API pricing for high-volume workloads.
Key strengths compared
Anthropic
- ▸Top coding benchmark scores (Claude 4 Opus)
- ▸200K context window on all Claude models
- ▸Aggressive prompt caching — up to 90% discount
Meta
- ▸Open-weight models — self-host on any GPU cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale
- ▸Llama 4 Behemoth: 2T parameter frontier model with 1M context window
- ▸Widest third-party hosting ecosystem — available on AWS, Azure, GCP, Together AI, Groq, and 20+ others
Provider category context
Anthropic is a frontier lab, founded in 2021. Meta is a open source host, founded in 2023. The category difference means these providers serve partially overlapping use cases — compare the model lists and pricing tables above to find the best fit for your specific workload.
How to choose between them
Choose Anthropic if you need top coding benchmark scores (claude 4 opus). Choose Meta if you need open-weight models — self-host on any gpu cloud for lowest per-token cost at scale. For high-volume production workloads, run a cost comparison using the token pricing table above with your actual prompt/completion token ratio — the cheapest provider depends heavily on your input-to-output token ratio.