ElevenLabs vs Groq: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of ElevenLabs and Groq — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.
ElevenLabs
Hyper-realistic AI voice and speech synthesis
ElevenLabs is the leading AI voice platform, offering text-to-speech and voice cloning APIs. Its multilingual v2 model supports 29 languages with near-human quality, and Flash v2.5 delivers ultra-low latency for real-time voice applications.
Groq
LPU-powered inference — the fastest tokens per second available
Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) that deliver dramatically higher throughput than GPU-based inference — Llama 3.3 70B reaches 750+ tokens/second on Groq, versus 100–200 on typical GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive applications, real-time chat, and high-volume batch workloads.
Key metrics
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Live token pricing
Strengths & weaknesses
ElevenLabs
Groq
Key differentiators
ElevenLabs Flash v2.5 delivers sub-300ms latency for real-time voice applications, making it the go-to choice for voice AI agents.
Groq's custom LPU chips deliver 750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — 4–5× faster than any GPU-based provider.
Frequently asked questions
ElevenLabs FAQs
What is ElevenLabs used for?
ElevenLabs provides text-to-speech and voice cloning APIs. It is used for audiobook generation, voice agents, dubbing, and any application requiring high-quality synthetic speech.
How does ElevenLabs pricing work?
ElevenLabs charges per character of text converted to speech. Pricing varies by plan and model — Flash v2.5 is cheaper and faster, while Multilingual v2 offers higher quality.
Groq FAQs
How fast is Groq inference?
Groq delivers 750+ tokens/second on Llama 3.3 70B and 1,200+ tokens/second on Llama 3.1 8B. This is 4–5× faster than typical GPU-based providers, making it ideal for real-time applications.
How much does Groq cost?
Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.59/1M input and $0.79/1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 8B is just $0.05/$0.08 per 1M tokens — among the cheapest options for a capable open-weight model.
What is a Groq LPU?
A Language Processing Unit (LPU) is Groq's custom silicon designed specifically for sequential token generation. Unlike GPUs which are optimised for parallel matrix operations, LPUs excel at the autoregressive decoding step that dominates LLM inference latency.
Provider resources
ElevenLabs — Hyper-realistic AI voice and speech synthesis
ElevenLabs is the leading AI voice platform, offering text-to-speech and voice cloning APIs. Its multilingual v2 model supports 29 languages with near-human quality, and Flash v2.5 delivers ultra-low latency for real-time voice applications.
ElevenLabs Flash v2.5 delivers sub-300ms latency for real-time voice applications, making it the go-to choice for voice AI agents.
Groq — LPU-powered inference — the fastest tokens per second available
Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) that deliver dramatically higher throughput than GPU-based inference — Llama 3.3 70B reaches 750+ tokens/second on Groq, versus 100–200 on typical GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive applications, real-time chat, and high-volume batch workloads.
Groq's custom LPU chips deliver 750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — 4–5× faster than any GPU-based provider.
Key strengths compared
ElevenLabs
- ▸Best-in-class voice quality
- ▸Ultra-low latency (Flash model)
- ▸29-language support
Groq
- ▸750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — fastest GPU-class inference
- ▸Sub-100ms time-to-first-token for real-time applications
- ▸Very competitive pricing on open-weight models
Provider category context
ElevenLabs is a inference api, founded in 2022. Groq is a inference api, founded in 2016. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.
How to choose between them
Both ElevenLabs and Groq host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.