Groq vs Voyage AI: Token Pricing, Speed & Intelligence
Full comparison of Groq and Voyage AI — live token pricing, latency, throughput, context window, strengths, weaknesses, and best use cases. Updated July 2026.
Groq
LPU-powered inference — the fastest tokens per second available
Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) that deliver dramatically higher throughput than GPU-based inference — Llama 3.3 70B reaches 750+ tokens/second on Groq, versus 100–200 on typical GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive applications, real-time chat, and high-volume batch workloads.
Voyage AI
State-of-the-art embedding and reranking models
Voyage AI specialises in embedding and reranking models for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and semantic search. Voyage 3.5 and its variants consistently top the MTEB leaderboard for retrieval quality.
Key metrics
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Live token pricing
Strengths & weaknesses
Groq
Voyage AI
Key differentiators
Frequently asked questions
Groq FAQs
How fast is Groq inference?
Groq delivers 750+ tokens/second on Llama 3.3 70B and 1,200+ tokens/second on Llama 3.1 8B. This is 4–5× faster than typical GPU-based providers, making it ideal for real-time applications.
How much does Groq cost?
Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.59/1M input and $0.79/1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 8B is just $0.05/$0.08 per 1M tokens — among the cheapest options for a capable open-weight model.
What is a Groq LPU?
A Language Processing Unit (LPU) is Groq's custom silicon designed specifically for sequential token generation. Unlike GPUs which are optimised for parallel matrix operations, LPUs excel at the autoregressive decoding step that dominates LLM inference latency.
Voyage AI FAQs
What is Voyage AI used for?
Voyage AI provides embedding and reranking models for RAG pipelines, semantic search, and document retrieval. It does not offer chat or text generation models.
How does Voyage AI compare to OpenAI embeddings?
Voyage 3.5 consistently outperforms OpenAI text-embedding-3-large on MTEB benchmarks while being significantly cheaper. It is the preferred choice for production RAG systems.
Provider resources
Groq — LPU-powered inference — the fastest tokens per second available
Groq runs custom Language Processing Units (LPUs) that deliver dramatically higher throughput than GPU-based inference — Llama 3.3 70B reaches 750+ tokens/second on Groq, versus 100–200 on typical GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive applications, real-time chat, and high-volume batch workloads.
Groq's custom LPU chips deliver 750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — 4–5× faster than any GPU-based provider.
Voyage AI — State-of-the-art embedding and reranking models
Voyage AI specialises in embedding and reranking models for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and semantic search. Voyage 3.5 and its variants consistently top the MTEB leaderboard for retrieval quality.
Voyage 3.5 Lite offers top-tier retrieval quality at just $0.02/1M tokens — the most cost-effective high-quality embedding available.
Key strengths compared
Groq
- ▸750+ tokens/sec on Llama 3.3 70B — fastest GPU-class inference
- ▸Sub-100ms time-to-first-token for real-time applications
- ▸Very competitive pricing on open-weight models
Voyage AI
- ▸Top MTEB leaderboard performance
- ▸Multimodal embedding support
- ▸Very competitive pricing
Provider category context
Groq is a inference api, founded in 2016. Voyage AI is a inference api, founded in 2023. Both are inference api providers — the comparison is primarily about pricing, model selection, and feature differentiation within the same tier.
How to choose between them
Both Groq and Voyage AI host open-weight models. The key differentiators are latency, throughput, and which specific model versions each provider offers. Check the speed metrics above — inference API providers often differ significantly on tokens-per-second for the same model. Pricing is typically competitive between them; availability of specific model versions (e.g., Llama 3.1 405B, DeepSeek V3) may be the deciding factor.